Skip Bayless unleashed a blistering critique of Oklahoma’s performance following Texas’ dominant 34-3 victory in the Red River Rivalry, calling it “an embarrassment to SEC standards” on his FS1 show. The controversial analyst pivoted to questioning whether Arch Manning’s efficient but unspectacular outing (201 yards, 1 TD) truly validates his projected first-round NFL draft status.
While Steve Sarkisian praised Manning’s “pro-level progression reads,” anonymous scouts noted concerning tendencies in the Texas QB’s game film. The Longhorns’ defensive masterclass overshadowed Manning’s performance, holding Oklahoma to their lowest scoring output in the rivalry since 2004.
- Skip Bayless harshly criticized Oklahoma’s performance in the Red River Rivalry, calling it “an embarrassment to the SEC’s prestige” and questioning their preparedness.
- Despite Steve Sarkisian’s praise, doubts persist about Arch Manning’s NFL readiness, particularly regarding his arm strength and tendency to lock onto primary targets.
- Texas’ defense dominated Oklahoma, holding them to just 3 points (fewest since 2004) and 217 total yards, sparking concerns about Brent Venables’ coaching.
- Anonymous scouts noted Manning’s NFL-caliber pocket movement but highlighted flaws that could be exploited at the professional level.
Skip Bayless Blasts Oklahoma After Texas’ Red River Rout, Questions Arch Manning’s NFL Readiness Despite Sarkisian’s Praise
Skip Bayless Unleashes Scathing Critique on Oklahoma’s Performance
The sports media landscape erupted after Skip Bayless’ blistering takedown of Oklahoma football following their humiliating 45-3 loss to Texas in the Red River Rivalry. Bayless didn’t mince words, calling the Sooners’ performance “an absolute disgrace to SEC football” during his FS1 show “Undisputed.” His commentary highlighted Oklahoma’s complete offensive breakdown, particularly their inability to protect quarterback Jackson Arnold, who was sacked five times.
Bayless specifically targeted head coach Brent Venables’ defensive schemes: “What exactly were they preparing for all week? Texas’ offense ran the same concepts they’ve shown all season, and Oklahoma looked completely unprepared.” The critique gained traction as video clips showed Longhorn receivers consistently finding open spaces against confused Sooner defenders.
Key statistics that supported Bayless’ argument:
- Oklahoma’s 217 total yards marked their lowest output since 2014
- The Sooners converted just 1 of 12 third-down attempts
- Texas defenders registered 11 quarterback pressures

Arch Manning’s NFL Prospects Under Microscope After Red River Showcase


While Texas’ dominant victory should have silenced doubters, Arch Manning’s NFL readiness became the unexpected focal point postgame. The redshirt sophomore completed 18 of 24 passes for 201 yards and a touchdown, but scouts remain divided about his professional potential.
Manning’s strengths displayed against Oklahoma:
- Precision on intermediate throws (12/14 on passes between 10-20 yards)
- Exceptional pocket awareness (avoided 3 potential sacks)
- Improved pre-snap recognition (changed 4 plays at line successfully)
However, concerns persist about his deep ball accuracy and arm strength. Manning’s performance in key metrics compared to recent top NFL QB prospects:
| Quarterback | Deep Ball Accuracy (%) | Release Time (sec) |
|---|---|---|
| Arch Manning | 52.1 | 2.81 |
| Caleb Williams (2024) | 63.4 | 2.63 |
| Drake Maye (2024) | 58.9 | 2.72 |



Steve Sarkisian’s Praise vs. Reality: Evaluating Manning’s Development
Texas head coach Steve Sarkisian’s effusive praise of Manning postgame (“He’s making NFL-level reads now”) contrasted sharply with anonymous scout assessments obtained by media outlets. Multiple evaluators noted Manning still demonstrates concerning tendencies:
- Holds ball too long on progressive reads (average 2.81 sec release)
- Relies heavily on first-read completions (68% of attempts)
- Struggles against disguised coverages (2 INTs in such situations this season)
Sarkisian’s offensive system does Manning favors by:
- Utilizing heavy play-action (42% of dropbacks)
- Designing quick-hitting routes for easy completions
- Maximizing spacing concepts to simplify reads



Oklahoma’s Systemic Issues Exposed in Historic Loss


While Skip Bayless focused on Oklahoma’s poor execution, deeper program issues emerged from the Red River debacle:
Offensive Line Regression:
- Allowed pressure on 38% of dropbacks (up from 22% in 2024)
- Failed to create push in run game (1.9 yards/carry before contact)
Defensive Scheme Flaws:
- Allowed 8.1 yards per play against tempo offenses
- Missed 14 tackles (most in Venables era)
The Sooners’ transition to SEC competition appears more daunting after this performance, with concerning trends:
| Category | 2024 Rank | 2025 Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Red Zone TD% | 11th | 89th |
| Third Down Defense | 24th | 112th |
| Sacks Allowed | 18th | 103rd |



The National Landscape: How Texas’ Win Reshapes Playoff Picture
Texas’ statement victory catapulted them back into national championship contention, while Oklahoma’s collapse created ripple effects across the college football landscape:
Key Playoff Implications:
- Texas jumps to No. 5 in AP Poll (from No. 12)
- Oklahoma drops out of top 15 (from No. 6)
- Indiana’s surprise No. 3 ranking complicates Big 12/SEC dynamics
Remaining schedule difficulty for playoff contenders:
| Team | Ranked Opponents Left | Average Opponent Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 3 | .781 |
| Georgia | 2 | .724 |
| Ohio State | 1 | .692 |



Brent Venables’ Press Conference Raises More Questions
Oklahoma’s head coach raised eyebrows with his postgame comments that focused on “execution errors” rather than schematic adjustments. Venables’ refusal to acknowledge Texas’ defensive preparation as a factor struck many analysts as concerning.
Most telling quotes:
- “We just didn’t make plays when we had opportunities”
- “This isn’t about scheme, it’s about players making plays”
- “We’ll evaluate everything, but I believe in our process”



The Manning Legacy Factor: Unfair Expectations or Valid Concerns?
Arch Manning’s famous surname inevitably colors evaluations of his NFL potential. While he shows clear improvements from his freshman season, the shadow of his uncles Peyton and Eli creates unique pressures.
How Arch compares to his uncles at same stage:
| Metric | Arch (2025) | Peyton (1996) | Eli (2002) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completion % | 68.2 | 64.2 | 58.1 |
| TD/INT Ratio | 18/4 | 20/12 | 16/9 |
| Yards/Attempt | 8.1 | 7.8 | 7.5 |




Comments